Tuesday, July 1, 2014

Fallible

 fal·li·ble adjective \ˈfa-lə-bəl\ : capable of making mistakes or being wrong (Merriam-Webster.com)

One might ask, why start a blog on patient safety with such a negative word?  Answer:  the recognition that everyone is fallible is the key to improving patient safety and quality.  There is great wisdom in the short title of the seminal Institute of Medicine report on reducing preventable medical errors:  To Err is Human.  Yet, 15 years later, some have still not grasped the meaning of this powerful concept.

I cannot tell you how many health care professionals, mostly physicians, but also nurses, physician assistants, etc., have related to me that they do not make mistakes.  “I do not have complications” one surgeon declared.  “They are known outcomes; they are not related to my care.”  While some complications are “known” they occur for varied reasons:  systems issues, human factors, and technical errors.  Knowing that the incidents happen offers the opportunity to understand why they happened and potentially decrease the chance of them happening again. This is the case whether they are a known or novel complication.

One example... Infections that result from the placement of central lines (central line associated blood stream infections or CLABSIs) have always been a known complication.  For a long time they were accepted and not reported or tracked.  What we have learned though analysis is that many, if not all of these “known” complications can be prevented by modifying systems and paying attention to commonly overlooked human factors.  It all started with admitting that we are fallible.

Another example of this behavior pertains to second opinions.  Patients always have the right to all of the information and being comfortable with the plan of action.  In a recent interview for Forbes, Marty Makary, MD noted that patients, when they are “going to have a major operation or start taking a potent medicine every day for the rest of your life…have a right and a duty to know what you’re getting into and what the options are.”  If they are not comfortable, or do not feel that they have all the information; they have every right to a second opinion.  Additionally, I like his notion that patients have a duty to be engaged.  Physicians must not discourage second opinions. The need for a second opinion only reflects poorly on the physician if they are not comfortable with fallibility.  One is not always right!  Physicians should embrace the fact that patients are engaged and not judge them negatively for wanting to be comfortable with a decision that will alter their life.

Finally, for health care teams to be successful, each member of the team must acknowledge their own fallibility.  They must also appreciate that all members of the team are fallible.  Nowhere is this truer than the use of checklists.  Much has been written on checklists, including a recent study from Canada published in the New England Journal of Medicine and two commentaries on the study from Lucian Leape, MD and AtulGawande, MD.  Checklists help to protect us from our fallibility.  This seems to be clear to most.  But for checklists are to work as they are intended, we must embrace that we are all fallible.  How is this so?  To appropriately answer each question on a checklist, one must assume the negative response and prove the positive response.  Why?  If this is not the case, checklists become the “box checking” bemoaned by many.  If we simply go through the motions, negatives get checked as positives and the checklist doesn't do its job.  The checklist protects nothing.  Concomitantly, checklists need to be transacted with teams - meaning more than one person.  Each team member must recognize that the other member(s) are fallible.  Without this bias, the double check does not serve a purpose.  Finally, if any member does not believe that an answer is affirmative, they are obligated to raise their hand and “stop the line.”  A culture that accepts everyone’s fallibility also accepts the ability to collectively get the answer right without repercussion.

Patient safety begins with providers recognizing that errors happen.  One cannot solve a problem that is not believed to exist.  Errors happen because we are all fallible.  If we work collectively within ever improving systems of care, we can protect patients from this reality and create a truly safe, reliable patient environment.

Thursday, May 29, 2014

Welcome

Welcome to A Word on Quality and Safety.  As the title suggests, the focus of this blog will be on improving the quality and safety of health care for patients.  My goal is to have regular posts that focus on one word and how that word relates to quality and patient safety.  I will also include periodic updates focused on timely topics related to the improvement of value in health care.  The focus will be how quality and safety impacts patients and patient care, but there will be a broad range of topics that are more loosely associated with that topic.

I have done some "guest blogging" in the past and blogged on issues related to osteopathic medical education, at blOGME:  Osteopathic Graduate Medical Education Blog.  I have been blessed with many wonderful mentors throughout my career and many worthwhile clinical, educational, and administrative experiences in the field of quality and safety.  I have also benefited a great deal from the wisdom of many other wonderful writers in the quality and safety blogosphere.  I have wanted start a blog focusing on quality and safety for some time as it is a passion and where I spend most of my professional efforts.

Why blog?  It is admittedly a mix of selfish and altruistic desires.  I selfishly would like to spend more time writing and sharing my thoughts.  It is often that I read something or see a tweet that spurs a different or complementary angle on a particular subject.  Blogging provides a forum for time-sensitive, semi-formal writing and the ability to share my spin on the topic at hand.  Altruistically, I believe there is room in the current world of health care quality and safety for different perspectives.  Hopefully these discussions will lead to improved care for patients.

I would consider my sight line to be patient-centered pragmatism.  What does that mean?  I try to see the world from a patient's perspective - or at least appreciate that their perspective is many times different than the health care provider.  Pragmatism signifies that I'm more interested in getting something positive done than fixing everything at once.  While I am always striving for perfection and I'm rarely content with the status quo, I understand that incremental change has its advantages over no change.

The aim is for A Word on Quality and Safety to add to the collective wisdom and improve the care for both individual patients and populations of patients.  I hope that you enjoy what you read and learn something along the way.